Provingx vs. everyone else, by name.
14 named vendors, their real current pricing, and 34 capabilities compared one row at a time. Every price links to that vendor's own page, and the rows where Provingx is the wrong tool are left in — you can find them by looking for our crosses.
Last verified September 2026. Vendors change pricing and features often — this is a snapshot, not a live feed.
The one distinction that matters more than any single feature row
The rows below split into four kinds of product. Gateways (Portkey, Kong, Cloudflare, LiteLLM, TrueFoundry, Helicone) are proxies like Provingx, but built for routing, caching and cost observability first. Content guardrails — Pangea, Lakera, Aporia — read prompts and responses for threats and sensitive data, which Provingx deliberately does not do. Authorization systems (Permit.io, Auth0, Arcade) govern identities, resources and tool execution. Governance platforms (Arthur, Credal) report on AI programmes. Provingx is the model-boundary control plane: identity and passport authorization, spend and fleet controls, and an Ed25519-signed decision receipt for every governed call. It sits alongside content scanning rather than pretending to replace it.
This market consolidated in 2025–26: Portkey is now part of Palo Alto Networks, Pangea of CrowdStrike, Lakera of Check Point, Aporia of Coralogix. Where that happened, the row says so — it usually changes who you buy from and what the roadmap answers to.
Won't the model and cloud providers just build this in?
Some of it, yes — usage logs, guardrail toggles and audit dashboards are already native to every major provider's own console, and that will keep expanding. What a provider cannot credibly ship is a decision that a third party can verify without trusting the provider that made it— a log is only evidence if whoever is being checked did not also build the checker. Provingx's receipts are signed independently of any model or cloud provider, and the transparency log they land in is built to be re-verified in the reader's own browser, against a head they pinned themselves, not against a claim rendered by our dashboard or theirs. That is a structural property, not a feature a platform update catches up on: a referee cannot also be a player, and every provider whose traffic passes through here is, first, a player.
7 rows where every name on this page draws a blank
Most rows below are Provingx against a real tick or a real dash — a competitor doing the job differently, or partway. These 7 are not that. Across every gateway, guardrail, authorization tool and governance platform named here, not one offers even an adjacent version — no partial credit to give anyone.
“Rows met in full” counts only the 34 rows below, which are the ones Provingx was built around — a guardrails vendor scoring low here is doing a different job well, not doing this job badly. 3 of those rows are ones we do not meet.
A dash is a real capability doing a nearby job: Pangea's Secure Audit Log genuinely publishes verification artifacts, but that is not a pre-execution authorization receipt; revoking a virtual key genuinely stops traffic, but it is not a per-user halt across a fleet. Click any vendor name to check the current product yourself.
AI gateways
Portkey (Palo Alto Networks) · Kong AI Gateway · Cloudflare AI Gateway · LiteLLM · TrueFoundry · Helicone
Built to route, cache and log traffic across providers, and genuinely good at it — several now enforce hard budgets and gate MCP tools too, which is why those rows are ticks. What none of them produce is a signed, independently verifiable decision for each call, or a per-agent policy you can prove was in force on a given date.
Guardrails & runtime security
Lakera Guard (Check Point) · Aporia (Coralogix)
Classify whether a prompt or response looks unsafe — prompt injection, PII, content policy. Provingx scores a cross on that row on purpose: it decides whether an identified call is allowed to happen, and leaves reading the content to tools built for it.
Content security & tamper-evident logging
Pangea AI Guard (CrowdStrike)
The closest thing to our evidence story, and the only vendor here that shares the consistency-proof row with us: its Secure Audit Log is a real Merkle log with membership and consistency proofs and a published root. The difference is what gets logged — an inspection verdict on content, rather than an authorization decision about an identified agent's call, its passport, budget and fleet state.
Agent identity & tool authorization
Permit.io · Auth0 for AI Agents (Okta) · Arcade.dev
Strong adjacent products for resource permissions, OAuth identity, MCP access, token vaults and human consent — they earn ticks on tool authorization and approval gates. They govern what an agent may touch; Provingx governs the model call itself, with spend, region and fleet controls and a receipt on each decision.
Enterprise AI governance
Arthur AI · Credal
Discovery, dashboards, evals and permission mirroring for enterprise AI programmes — real value for compliance reporting. They integrate via SDK, OTEL and platform hooks rather than sitting in front of every model call, and neither publishes a signed receipt an outsider can verify.
When not to buy Provingx
If what you need is failover between providers, semantic caching and a cheaper routing bill, buy a gateway — we do not do those and are not planning to. If what you need is prompt-injection defence and content classification, buy a guardrails product; several of them run as a plugin in front of, or behind, a proxy like ours. Provingx is worth paying for when someone will eventually ask who authorized this call, under which rule, and can you prove it — and a screenshot of a dashboard is not going to be an acceptable answer.
See the difference on your own traffic.
No sales call required — start free, point your existing client at Provingx, and watch the first decision get signed.